CASE REPORT
THE ROLE OF SHOCKWAVE INTRAVASCULAR LITHOTRIPSY IN THE TREATMENT OF HEAVILY CALCIFIED CORONARY ARTERY LESIONS: OUR FIRST EXPERIENCE

UDK:616.133-003.7-085.8

Boshev M1,2, Jovkovski A1,2, Manev N1,2, Georgiev A1,2, Pejkov H1,2, Kedev S1,2

1University Clinic of Cardiology, Vodnjanska Str. 17, 1000 Skopje, N. Macedonia

2Faculty of Medicine, “Ss. Cyril and Methodius” University in Skopje, N. Macedonia

 

Abstract

Introduction: Coronary artery disease (CAD) is typically a chronic, progressive, inflammatory disease of the coronary arteries caused by coronary atherosclerosis. Moderate-to-severe calcification is present in up to 30% of patients undergoing coronary angiography (CA). Calcified coronary artery lesions are one of the most complex and challenging lesion subsets in interventional cardiology. Shockwave intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) is a recently introduced calcium-modifying technique for the treatment of concentric, eccentric and nodular calcifications.

Case presentation: We present a clinical case of a 73-year-old male complaining of intermittent chest pain. He was a non-smoker with a positive familiar history for CVD. He had previous myocardial infarction and stenting of the right coronary artery (RCA), previous CVI, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, insulin-dependent type 2 diabetes, heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage II/IIIa. CA revealed heavily calcified CAD. A calcified lesion of the left anterior descending artery (LAD) was treated using a 3.0/12 mm Shockwave IVL balloon; and calcium cracks and fractures were confirmed by optical coherence tomography (OCT). We proceeded with an NC balloon and finally treated the lesion with a 3.5/15 mm drug-coated balloon (DCB). The calcified lesion of the RCA was treated with conventional techniques using guiding catheter extension, NC balloons and drug-eluting stent (DES).

Conclusion: Heavily calcified coronary artery lesions remain one of the biggest challenges for interventional cardiologists. Shockwave IVL is designed for treatment of all types of heavily calcified lesions using acoustic waves (shock waves). IVL is safe and effective technique that will definitely strengthen the armamentarium for modern treatment of heavily calcified lesions.

 

Keywords: Calcified lesion, coronary artery disease, calcium-modifying technique, Shockwave IVL.

 

References:

  1. Petousis S, Skalidis E, Zacharis E. et al. The Role of Intracoronary Imaging for the Management of Calcified Lesions. J. Clin. Med. 2023; 12: 4622. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12144622
  2. McInerney A, Escaned J, Gonzalo N. Calcified coronary artery disease: pathophysiology, intracoronary imaging assessment, and plaque modification techniques. REC Interv Cardiol. 2022; 4(3):216-227. https://doi.org/10.24875/RECICE.M22000291
  3. Bulluck H, McEntegart M. Contemporary tools and devices for coronary calcium modification. JRSM Cardiovascular Disease. 2022; Volume 11: 1–8. DOI: 10.1177/20480040221089760
  4. Jurado-Román A, Gomez-Menchero A, Gonzalo N. et al. Plaque modification techniques to treat calcified coronary lesions. Position paper from the ACI-SEC. REC Interv Cardiol. 2023; 5(1):46-61. https://doi.org/10.24875/RECICE.M22000345
  5. Vieceli Dalla Sega F, Fortini F, Severi P. et al. Cardiac Calcifications: Phenotypes, Mechanisms, Clinical and Prognostic Implications. Biology. 2022; 11: 414. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11030414
  6. Morris CM, Kreutz PR. Coronary calcification: types, morphology and distribution. Interventional Cardiology. 2025; 20:e13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15420/icr.2024.03
  7. Lee JS, Lee I, Jeon J. Vascular calcification—New insights into its mechanism. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020; 21:2685; doi:10.3390/ijms21082685
  8. Furgoł T, Karska K, Miciak M. et al. Coronary artery disease with heavily calci­fied lesions – literature review of novel therapeutic methods. Folia Med (Plovdiv). 2025; 67(2):e141763. doi: 10.3897/folmed.67.e141763
  9. Kaul A, Dhalla P, Bapatla A, et al. Current treatment modalities for calcified coronary artery disease: a review article comparing novel intravascular lithotripsy and traditional rotational atherectomy. Cureus. 2020; 12(10): e10922. DOI 10.7759/cureus.10922
  10. Milzi A, Simonetto F, Landi A. Percutaneous revascularization of thrombotic and calcified coronary lesions. J. Clin. Med. 2025; 14: 692. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14030692
  11. Vizzari G, Laterra G, Mazzone P. et al. From single debulking techniques to combined approaches: a review of bailout strategies in heavily calcified coronary lesions. Vessel Plus. 2025; 9:5 https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1209.2024.59
  12. Russo D, Massaro G, Benedetto D. et al. Contemporary approach to heavily calcified lesions: tools of the trade, challenges, and pitfalls. Vessel Plus. 2024; 8:9 DOI: 10.20517/2574-1209.2023.75
  13. Rijlaarsdam-Hermsen D, Lo-Kioeng-Shioe MS, Kuijpers D. et al. Prognostic value of the coronary artery calcium score in suspected coronary artery disease: a study of 644 symptomatic patients. Neth Heart J. 2020; 28(1):44-50. doi: 10.1007/s12471-019-01335-7. PMID: 31654323; PMCID: PMC6940415.
  14. Khattak S, Shahid F, Khan QS. Challenges and risks associated with coronary calcified lesions in cardiovascular interventions: What makes calcified lesions more challenging and dangerous? AIMS Medical Science. 2025; 12(1): 69–89. DOI: 10.3934/medsci.2025006
  15. Riley RF, Patel MP, Abbott JD et al. SCAI Expert Consensus Statement on the Management of Calcified Coronary Lesions. Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions. 2023; 3:101259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jscai.2023.101259
  16. Sammour MY, Mohamed AK, El-Sabawi B. et al. Approach to coronary calcium and procedural techniques during percutaneous coronary intervention. Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine. 2025; 27:26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11936-025-01083-5
  17. Ueki Y, Otsuka T, Hibi K. et al. The value of intracoronary imaging and coronary physiology when treating calcified lesions. Interventional Cardiology Review. 2019; 14(3):164–8. https://doi.org/10.15420/icr.2019.16.R1
  18. Malik S, Shlofmitz E, Shlofmitz AR. Essentials of coronary calcium evaluation. Cardiac interventions today. July/August 2024; Vol. 18, No 4.
  19. “LithiX hertz contact IVL (HC-IVL) delivers optimal stent expansion in calcified lesions”. https://elixirmedical.com/ous/lithix/
  20. “Shockwave C2”. https://shockwavemedical.com/en-eu/products/shockwave-c2-plus/ (accessed Oct. 20, 2025).
  21. Misztal M, Trystula M, Konieczynska M. et al. Intravascular lithotripsy with peripheral Shockwave catheter – a breakthrough in calcified carotid artery stenosis treatment. Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2020; 16(4):491–494. doi: 10.5114/aic.2020.101778
  22. Brinton J.T. “Disrupt CAD – A multicenter, prospective, single-arm study of percutaneous lithoplasty prior to stent implantation in heavily calcified coronary lesions” https://www.acc.org/~/media/Clinical/PDF-Files/Approved-PDFs/2016/10/25/07/TCT16_Oct29/12pmET%20DISRUPT%20CAD.pdf (accessed Oct. 26, 2025).
  23. Ali AZ, Nef H. Escaned H. et al. Safety and effectiveness of coronary intravascular lithotripsy for treatment of severely calcified coronary stenoses: The Disrupt CAD II study. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019; 10: e008434. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008434. Epub 2019 Sep
  24. Hill MJ, Kereiakes JD, Schlofmitz AR et al. Intravascular lithotripsy for treatment of severely calcified coronary artery disease. JACC.2020; 76(22):2635-2646.doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.09.603. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
  25. “FDA approves shockwave intravascular lithotripsy for calcified coronaries”. https://www.tctmd.com/news/fda-approves-shockwave-intravascular-lithotripsy-calcified-coronaries (accesses Oct. 26, 2025).
  26. Saito S, Yamazaki S, Takahashi A. et al. Intravascular lithotripsy for vessel preparation in severely calcified coronary arteries prior to stent placement – primary outcomes from the Japanese Disrupt CAD IV Study. Circ J. 2021; 85(6):826-833. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-20-1174. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
  27. “EuroPCR 2025 I BALI Trial: Intravascular lithotripsy vs. conventional lesion preparation in calcified lesions”. https://solaci.org/en/2025/05/22/europcr-2025-bali-trial-intravascular-lithotripsy-vs-conventional-lesion-preparation-in-calcified-lesions/ (accessed Oct. 26, 2025).
  28. Honton B. on the behalf of ICARE trial investigators. Intravascular lithotripsy in comparison to rotational atherectomy: An evaluation by OFDI. ICARE trial – OFDI. https://www.pcronline.com/Cases-resources-images/Resources/Course-videos-slides/2025/EuroPCR/Intracoronary-imaging-guidance-for-PCI (accessed Oct. 26, 2025).
  29. “Intravascular lithotripsy in comparison to rotational atherectomy: An evaluation by OFDI (ICARE)”. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05394649 (accessed Oct. 26, 2025).
  30. Cassese S, Simonetti F, Cavarubias AAH. et al. Intracoronary stenting and additional results achieved by shockWAVE coronary lithotripsy: design and rationale of ISAR-WAVE Trial. American Heart Journal.  2025; 282:1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2024.12.008.